Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Probiotic. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta Probiotic. Mostrar todas las entradas

16 junio, 2013

Probiotics for treating persistent diarrhoea in children

Percentage of rotavirus tests with positive re...Source: Pediatria Basada en la evidencia.

Image via Wikipedia
Enhanced by Zemanta

15 abril, 2013

Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrrhoea

Probiotic Drinks
Probiotic Drinks (Photo credit: Jepster)
Allen SJ, Martinez EG, Gregorio GV, et al. Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;11:CD003048. (Review) PMID: 21069673PMID: 21069673

BACKGROUND: Probiotics may offer a safe intervention in acute infectious diarrhoea to reduce the duration and severity of the illness.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of probiotics in proven or presumed acute infectious diarrhoea.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group`s trials register (July 2010), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2010), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2010), EMBASE (1988 to July 2010), and reference lists from studies and reviews. We also contacted organizations and individuals working in the field, and pharmaceutical companies manufacturing probiotic agents.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing a specified probiotic agent with a placebo or no probiotic in people with acute diarrhoea that is proven or presumed to be caused by an infectious agent.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the trial and extracted data. Primary outcomes were the mean duration of diarrhoea, stool frequency on day 2 after intervention and ongoing diarrhoea on day 4. A random-effects model was used.
MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 8014 participants. Of these, 56 trials recruited infants and young children. The trials varied in the definition used for acute diarrhoea and the end of the diarrhoeal illness, as well as in the risk of bias. The trials were undertaken in a wide range of different settings and also varied greatly in organisms tested, dosage, and participants` characteristics. No adverse events were attributed to the probiotic intervention.Probiotics reduced the duration of diarrhoea, although the size of the effect varied considerably between studies.The average of the effect was significant for mean duration of diarrhoea (mean difference 24.76 hours; 95% confidence interval 15.9 to 33.6 hours; n=4555, trials=35) diarrhoea lasting >/=4 days (risk ratio 0.41; 0.32 to 0.53; n=2853, trials=29) and stool frequency on day 2 (mean difference 0.80; 0.45 to 1.14; n=2751, trials=20).The differences in effect size between studies was not explained by study quality, probiotic strain, the number of different strains, the viability of the organisms, dosage of organisms, the causes of diarrhoea, or the severity of the diarrhoea, or whether the studies were done in developed or developing countries.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Used alongside rehydration therapy, probiotics appear to be safe and have clear beneficial effects in shortening the duration and reducing stool frequency in acute infectious diarrhoea. However, more research is needed to guide the use of particular probiotic regimens in specific patient groups

29 junio, 2011

Lactobacillus GG in the Prevention of Nosocomial Gastrointestinal and Respiratory Tract Infections

Schematic diagram of the respiratory tract ant...Image via Wikipedia
  1. PEDIATRICS Vol. 125 No. 5 May 1, 2010 
    pp. e1171 -e1177 
    (doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2568)
  1. » AbstractFree
  1. Iva Hojsak, MDa
  2. Slaven Abdović, MDa
  3. Hania Szajewska, MDb,
  4. Milan Milošević, MDc
  5. Željko Krznarić, MD, PhDd
  6. Sanja Kolaček, MD, PhDa
+Author Affiliations
  1. aReferral Center for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital Zagreb, Klaićeva 16, Zagreb, Croatia;
  2. b2nd Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland;
  3. cDepartment for Environmental and Occupational Health, “Andrija Štampar” School of Public Health, Rockefellerova 4, Zagreb, Croatia; and
  4. dDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kispaticeva 12, Zagreb, Croatia

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of nosocomial infections, predominantly gastrointestinal and respiratory, in children in developed countries is high, ranging from 5% to 44%. There is no effective strategy for preventing these infections. The objective of our study was to investigate the role ofLactobacillusGG (LGG) in preventing nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections at a pediatric hospital.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 742 hospitalized children. They were randomly allocated to receive for their hospitalization LGG at a dose of 109 colony-forming units in 100 mL of a fermented milk product (LGG group, n = 376) or placebo that was the same postpasteurized fermented milk product without LGG (placebo group, n = 366).
RESULTS: In the LGG group, compared with the placebo group, we found a significantly reduced risk for gastrointestinal infections (relative risk [RR]: 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25–0.70]; number needed to treat: 15 [95% CI: 9–34)], respiratory tract infections (RR: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.18–0.85]; number needed to treat: 30 [95% CI: 16–159]), vomiting episodes (RR: 0.5 [95% CI: 0.3–0.9]), diarrheal episodes (RR: 0.24 [95% CI: 0.10–0.50]), episodes of gastrointestinal infections that lasted >2 days (RR: 0.40 [95% CI: 0.25–0.70]), and episodes of respiratory tract infections that lasted >3 days (RR: 0.4 [95% CI: 0.2–0.9]). Groups did not differ in hospitalization duration (P = .1).
CONCLUSIONS: LGG administration can be recommended as a valid measure for decreasing the risk for nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections in pediatric facilities.