Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta American College of Physicians. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta American College of Physicians. Mostrar todas las entradas

11 abril, 2013

Before Prostate Cancer Screening, Men Should Know Harm Is More Likely Than Benefit



Men should know that they are more likely to be harmed than to benefit from prostate cancer screening and should only be screened if they have a strong preference for screening, a new guideline states. Image: scibak/iStockphoto.com
Men should know that they are more likely to be harmed than to benefit from prostate cancer screening and should only be screened if they have a strong preference for screening, a new guideline states. Image: scibak/iStockphoto.com
Men should be fully informed that they’re unlikely to benefit from prostate cancer screening and may face a substantial risk of various harms, such as complications from biopsy or treatment that may include infection, incontinence, or impotency, according to a new guideline from the American College of Physicians (ACP) published today in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
One in 6 men will be diagnosed as having prostate cancer in his lifetime, but only 3 of 100 men who are diagnosed as having the disease will die of it, according to the guideline. In other words, 97 of 100 men with prostate cancer will die of some other cause. In addition, most men who die of prostate cancer are older than 75 years. Yet despite the low risk of death from prostate cancer, especially among younger men, screening—using either the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests or a digital rectal examination—continues to be commonplace.
Thus, the likelihood of a man benefiting from prostate cancer screening is quite limited; about 1000 men would have to be screened to save 1 life, the guideline notes. Harm resulting from testing, however, is far more common. The false-positive rate for these tests is high and men who receive a positive result may undergo further invasive tests, such as a prostate biopsy, which can lead to infection, bleeding, or hospitalization. In addition, men who are diagnosed as having prostate cancer are likely to undergo radiation or surgery. Prostate cancer surgery is associated with a small increased risk of death, a 37% increased risk of sexual dysfunction, and an 11% increased risk of urinary incontinence.
Based on these risks and the fact that few men are likely to benefit, the US Preventive Services Task Force has recommended against prostate cancer screening with the PSA test. Other guidelines reviewed by the ACP as part of their own guideline-producing process recommend that physicians talk with patients about the risks and the patient’s preferences.
The ACP recommends that physicians fully inform patients aged 50 to 69 years that they are unlikely to benefit and face a substantial risk of harm from prostate cancer screening. The group also says that screening with the PSA test should be carried out only after such disclosure has occurred and the patient has expressed a clear preference for screening.
The authors conclude that “each man should have the opportunity to decide for himself whether to have the PSA screening test.”
Moreover, the ACP advises against prostate cancer screening with a PSA test for men younger than 50 years, older than 69 years, or with a remaining life expectancy of less than 10 to 15 years.

25 agosto, 2011

Azithromycin for Prevention of COPD Exacerbations


Azithromycin for Prevention of COPD Exacerbations

Summer’s coming to a close and the patient sitting in your office is worried.  A bad cough and wheeze sent him to the hospital for three days last winter, and he feels like he’s never quite gotten back to normal. He stopped smoking a few years ago, and uses the long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids you prescribed. But he still worries about another COPD exacerbation; it seems like each time he gets sick, it’s more difficult to recover.  Is there anything else he can do to make it less likely he’ll get sick again this year?
The answer, according to a study published in this week’s NEJM, is yes. Azithromycin taken daily for a year decreased the frequency of COPD exacerbations and improved quality of life in a cohort with COPD, reports Richard Albert and colleagues.
Why azithromycin? The macrolide antibiotic has anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory benefits (which is why it is given to patients with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis) on top of its antibiotic action. However, studies have been split on the question of whether long-term antibiotics benefit patients with COPD.
Enter the current study, which enrolled 1,142 patients with COPD from 12 academic centers across the United States.  To be eligible for the study, all patients either used continuous supplemental oxygen or had suffered a COPD exacerbation in the past year that required systemic steroids, a visit to the ED or hospitalization. Approximately 80 percent were receiving inhaled corticosteroids and/or long-acting bronchodilators. (Patients with prolonged QTc or hearing loss were excluded from the study – as these are known to be adverse effects associated with azithromycin).
Participants were randomly assigned to take either azithromycin at a 250 mg daily dose or a placebo pill for a year. Those with daily azithromycin stayed exacerbation-free for a significantly longer time: 266 days prior to first exacerbation versus 174 days for those with placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality.  
The daily antibiotic also helped patients’ quality of life, as measured by a commonly used survey which asks about symptoms, activity level and overall comfort. However, taking an antibiotic daily does not come without risk.
The biggest concern, of course, is increasing microbial resistance.  To investigate this question, each patient had nasopharyngeal swabs taken at study visits. More patients in the azithromycin group became colonized with bacteria that were resistant to macrolide antibiotics, but this finding didn’t have any clear clinical significance. It remains unknown what this resistance pattern could mean for patients’ families or community.
Hearing loss was also a potential issue. More patients taking azithromycin than placebo experienced a decrement in their hearing over the year.
In an accompanying editorial, Nikolaos M. Siafakis, a pulmonologist who is the president of the European Respiratory Society, balanced these risks and benefits, and wrote that the study data come out in favor of azithromycin: “The findings of Albert and co-workers…in my opinion turns the balance towards the benefits of azithromycin treatment. However, if azithromycin is going to be used in patients known to be frequent COPD exacerbators, then the local antibiotic resistance patterns should be closely monitored…On balance however the long term use of azithromycin to prevent AECOPD seems to be a risk in accord with the classical advice of Hippocrates – do good – no harm.”
Question:  Would you put the patient in question on long-term azithromycin based on this study?